JOSE ALFREDO JIMENEZ JOVEN TRIAL

Creemos innecesario volver a relatar los hechos, asi como la opinion de la mayoria, de la cual no esta conforme la Corte Suprema de estas Islas. Al.,вЂ™ que se promulgo el 27 de febrero de este aГ±o. 45325, вЂ™Francis Lusk versus Frederic Stevens Et. 'Esta es una mocion de reconsideracion presentada por los abogados de los recurridos, que contienden que la decision de este Tribunal debe dejarse sin efecto y, en su lugar se dicte otra, sobreseyendo la demanda en vista de la decision de la Corte Suprema en R. Respondents moved to reconsider, and on November 16, 1937, the Court of Appeals favorably resolved this motion as follows: jgc:

JOSE ALFREDO JIMENEZ JOVEN TRIAL

On February 23, 1937, the Court of Appeals, by a divided court, granted the writ, holding, in substance, that the trial court proceeded irregularly and with abuse of discretion in issuing the order complained of. 3198 of the Court of First Instance of Cavite. 1253, to nullify the order of the trial court of December 14, 1936, ordering the execution of the judgment rendered against her in civil case No. On January 5, 1937, plaintiff sued out a writ of certiorari in the Court of Appeals, G. Twice plaintiff moved to reconsider this latter order both motions were denied, and plaintiff excepted to each denial. Against plaintiffвЂ™s opposition, the court granted the motion for incorporation. Camus, in turn, moved ex parte to have their motion asking for the execution of the judgment as well as the order granting the said execution, incorporated in the bill of exceptions. On December 19, 1936, plaintiff moved to reconsider and to annul the courtвЂ™s order of December 14, 1936, ordering the execution of the judgment. On December 17, 1936, the court approved plaintiffвЂ™s bill of exceptions and ordered the same, together with the evidence of the case, elevated to the Court of Appeals. On December 14, 1936, the court, after oral argument, ordered the execution of the judgment unless the plaintiff could give a bond in the amount of P5,000. The following day, November 21, 1936, defendants presented a motion for execution of the judgment pending the appeal.

On November 20, 1936, plaintiff filed a bill of exceptions preparatory to her appeal. Camus of the litigated properties with the improvements existing thereon. Camus, Defendants, judgment was entered on November 7, 1936, absolving the defendants from the complaint and ordering the plaintiff to yield possession to defendant Jose S. 3198 of the Court of First Instance of Cavite, Jovita Joven, Plaintiff, v. This is a petition for certiorari to review a resolution of the Court of Appeals of Novemin C.

Jose alfredo jimenez joven